1Background & Objective
- Question: does vaginal microecology influence cervical lesions via DNA methylation?
- Objective: correlate microecology, PAX1/JAM3 methylation & lesion grade; test mediation.
2Study Design & Cohort
81
HPV/TCT(−)
236
chronic inflam.
117
LSIL
58
HSIL
81
HPV/TCT(−)
236
chronic inflam.
117
LSIL
58
HSIL
BMI
differs (neg. group highest)
孕次
parity differs
16/18
HPV16/18 ↑ in HSIL
- Setting: Xiangya 3rd Hospital, Apr 2022 – Aug 2024; cross-sectional.
- Grouping: HPV/TCT + colposcopy biopsy pathology → 4 ordered groups.
- Samples: vaginal swab (qualitative flora) + cervical cells (PAX1/JAM3 ΔCt).
- Microecology panel: density · diversity · Nugent · pH · dominant flora · leukocyte esterase · lactobacilli.
- Analysis: ANOVA / Kruskal-Wallis · ordinal logistic · linear regression · mediation (Process 4.1, 5000 boot).
- Outcome: lesion grade ordered from negative → chronic inflammation → LSIL → HSIL.
- Groups: only non-negative groups were hrHPV+, HSIL with more HPV16/18.
- Statistics: LSD pairwise · Pearson χ² · Spearman; mediation bootstrap 5000.
Lower ΔCt = higher methylation; both increase with lesion grade.
3Microecology Differs by Grade
- Dysbiosis markers: density, diversity, Nugent, pH, dominant flora, leukocyte esterase — differ across groups (P<0.05).
- Lactobacillus: L. iners & L. crispatus detection differ (P<0.05) — L. crispatus protective.
4Mediation — the Key Finding
−0.099
mediation effect
−0.170 ~ −0.039
95% CI (excludes 0)
0.906
OR via mediator
−9.4%
risk per SD of ΔCtP
- Full mediation: L. crispatus acts through PAX1 methylation (OR 0.906); direct effect ns.
- Mechanism: protective flora ↑ → methylation ↓ → lower lesion risk.
5Risk Factors & Methylation Drivers
- Methylation drivers: older age & hrHPV (esp. 16/18) raise PAX1/JAM3 methylation.