Int J Gynecol Cancer · 2025;35(10):102110 · Screening Study · China

CDO1/CELF4 Methylation for EC Screening in Premenopausal AUB

DNA methylation detection is a significant biomarker for screening endometrial cancer in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding
296 premenopausal AUB women · CDO1m OR 64.49 · dual-gene Se 85.7% / Sp 87.6% · dual + BMI/ET AUC up to 0.955
Zhao X, Yang Y, Fu Y, Lv W, Xu D
Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University · Int J Gynecol Cancer 2025;35(10):102110 · doi:10.1136/ijgc-2024-005723
296
premenopausal AUB
OR 64.49
CDO1m risk factor
85.7%
dual-gene Se
87.6%
dual-gene Sp

1Background & Objective

  • Problem: AUB is common but few have EC; TVS & CA125 limited; invasive hysteroscopy over-used.
  • Objective: validate CDO1m/CELF4m screening in premenopausal AUB, alone & combined with BMI/ET.

2Study Design & Cohort

296
premenopausal AUB
2021.11–22.10
enrollment
hysteroscopy
gold standard
  • Setting: Third Xiangya Hospital OB/GYN; consecutive premenopausal AUB.
  • Assays: ThinPrep cervical cells → CDO1m/CELF4m; TVS ET; serum CA125.
  • Readout: CDO1m ΔCt ≤8.4 · CELF4m ΔCt ≤8.8 · dual = either positive.
  • Analysis: univariate logistic (OR) · ROC/AUC · subgroup by BMI & ET.
  • Cut-offs: BMI ≥25 · ET ≥11 mm (premenopausal proliferative phase).
64.49
CDO1m OR (20.5–203.3)
42.53
dual OR (11.9–152.0)
12.79
CELF4m OR (4.9–33.3)
dual Se
85.7%
dual Sp
87.6%
Se 85.7%
dual · sensitivity
Sp 87.6%
dual · specificity
AUC 0.955
best combo
  • AUB spectrum: menorrhagia · cycle irregularity · intermenstrual spotting.
  • Outcome: EC confirmed by hysteroscopic histology in this cohort.
  • Why premenopausal AUB: younger EC is rising; TVS thresholds controversial in this group.
  • CA125: classic marker but low accuracy — included for comparison.
  • Reuse: ThinPrep sample also serves cytology — no extra collection.
  • Protection: fewer unnecessary hysteroscopies preserves fertility & reduces burden.
  • Best model: BMI <25 + ET + dual methylation AUC 0.955 — near-perfect screening.
  • Independent value: each methylation marker significant even after BMI/ET adjustment.
Methylation outperformed other non-invasive indicators in this premenopausal AUB cohort; combining with BMI or ET further improves screening.

3Risk Factors — OR Comparison

CDO1m
OR 64.49
Dual-gene
OR 42.53
CELF4m
OR 12.79
ET ≥11 mm
OR 8.41
BMI ≥25
OR 4.76
  • Methylation dominates: CDO1m OR 64.49 (20.46–203.33) — far above ET/BMI.

4ROC & Dual-Gene Performance

ROC curves of methylation, ET and combinations
Fig. ROC — ET, single/dual methylation & combined models for EC screening.
85.7%
Se · dual
87.6%
Sp · dual
  • Best balance: dual-gene methylation highest Se/Sp among single tests.
  • Combination: dual + BMI or ET lifts screening efficiency further.

5Subgroup Combined AUC

0.955
BMI <25 · ET+dual
0.898
BMI ≥25 · ET+dual
0.938
ET ≥11 · BMI+dual
0.906
ET <11 · BMI+dual
  • Consistently high: combined models reach AUC 0.90–0.96 in every subgroup.
  • Practical: methylation + TVS/BMI is a simple clinic-based screening step.
Clinical Significance